From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reece v. Traquina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2949 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2949 JAM DAD P

03-13-2013

CHARLES G. REECE, Plaintiff, v. ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, Defendant.


ORDER

On February 4, 2013, the court issued an order granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint with respect to his claim that defendant Traquina was responsible for an institutional policy of failing to provide blood pressure screening to inmates when the prison was on lockdown. (Doc. No. 34.) On February 22, 2013, plaintiff timely filed his amended complaint. Defense counsel has informally contacted the court inquiring when defendant's response to the amended complaint is due.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Traquina shall file a responsive pleading or answer to plaintiff's amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this order.

_______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reece v. Traquina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2949 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Reece v. Traquina

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES G. REECE, Plaintiff, v. ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2949 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)