From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rednour v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 9, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-273 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-273

02-09-2015

GARY REDNOUR, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #3), AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #7); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOCS. ##5 AND 10, AS SUPPLEMENTED BY UNDATED LETTER, DOC. #11); DISMISSING PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. #1) WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; TERMINATION ENTRY

On August 18, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz issued a Report and Recommendations, Doc. #3, recommending that the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. #1, be dismissed with prejudice, and that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendations, Doc. #5, and the Court recommitted the matter to Magistrate Judge Merz, Doc. #6.

On November 10, 2014, Magistrate Judge Merz issued a Supplemental Report and Recommendations, Doc. #7, again recommending that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed Objections, Doc. #10, which he supplemented with an undated letter received by the Court on January 20, 2015, Doc. #11.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael Merz, in his August 18, 2014, Report and Recommendations, and his November 10, 2014, Supplemental Report and Recommendations, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filings, Docs. ##3 and 7, in their entirety.

The Court OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections thereto, Docs. ##5 and 10, as supplemented by the undated letter, Doc. #11, as meritless.

The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. #1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Given that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, further, that the Court's decision herein would not be debatable among reasonable jurists, and because any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, and is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Judgment will be entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Date: February 9, 2015

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rednour v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 9, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-273 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Rednour v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:GARY REDNOUR, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-273 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 9, 2015)