From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 7, 2022
330 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-383

01-07-2022

Robert REDMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Robert Redmon, Bushnell, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert Redmon, Bushnell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Robert Redmon's judgment and sentence without discussion. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the $9 in costs assessed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), as Redmon was not charged with traffic infractions. See Boyd v. State, 317 So. 3d 1285, 1285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) ; Sorenson v. State, 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Redmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 7, 2022
330 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Redmon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert REDMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jan 7, 2022

Citations

330 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

Simpson v. State

We remand for the trial court to strike the $3 cost imposed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida…