From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redfox v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Oct 18, 2021
3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS (D. Alaska Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS

10-18-2021

WYATT N. REDFOX, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SHARON L. GLEASON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

At Docket 27, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this action back to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue.

Upon review, the Court determines that Mr. Redfox's incarcerated and indigent status has not changed. And the Court finds that at least Mr. Redfox's individual claims are not frivolous. Therefore, the district court finds that in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002).


Summaries of

Redfox v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Oct 18, 2021
3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS (D. Alaska Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Redfox v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:WYATT N. REDFOX, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Alaska

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS (D. Alaska Oct. 18, 2021)