Opinion
24-cv-01979-EMC
04-24-2024
MARY ANN REDEAUX, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NOEL WISE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINITFFS' MOTION FOR TRO DOCKET NO. 11
EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Currently pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiffs ask “the federal court [to] grant [a] restraining order and block the state of California from receiving federal funding because the state/court policies and procedures violate the due process rights of the state citizens.” Mot. at 4. Plaintiffs indicate that their due process rights have been violated because “[t]he state of California committed real estate deed fraud.” Mot. at 3.
Plaintiffs' motion for relief is DENIED. This case is already closed. To the extent Plaintiffs assert that this Court has a conflict of interest, that issue has already been addressed in the Court's prior order. See Docket No. (Order at 2) (noting that an adverse ruling is not sufficient cause of recusal).
IT IS SO ORDERED.