From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 14, 2005
164 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 84985.

June 14, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.

Richard P. Hereford, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.


ORDER


Earl Redd ("movant") appeals from the order of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Redd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 14, 2005
164 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Redd v. State

Case Details

Full title:Earl REDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 14, 2005

Citations

164 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)