From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reda v. Peerless Indem. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 3:10-cv-01103 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-01103

03-06-2012

ALGANESH REDA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A U AND I FOOD MART PLAINTIFFS v. PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, MONTGOMERY INSURANCE COMPANY AND LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP DEFENDANTS


US District Judge Nixon

US Magistrate Judge Knowles

JURY DEMAND


MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE SET FOR TRIAL

Come now the Plaintiffs, by and through the undersigned and move this court for an order continuing the case set for trial on the 27tth day of March, 2012 to another date designated by the court. In support of the motion, the parties would show that the case is complex and that discovery has not been completed. Further, the Plaintiffs would respectfully state that neither party will be prejudiced by the continuance and that the Defendants are in agreement and offer no objection to the motion.

Respectfully Submitted,

_________________________

Kathy A. Leslie #013587

Sister In Law Legal Firm

202 Point East Drive

Nashville, Tennessee 37216

Phone: 1.888.598.0009

Efax: 615.216.4802

Attorney for Plaintiffs


Summaries of

Reda v. Peerless Indem. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 3:10-cv-01103 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Reda v. Peerless Indem. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALGANESH REDA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A U AND I FOOD MART PLAINTIFFS v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-01103 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 6, 2012)