concluding that R.C. 2323.51[B], by its express terms, does not mandate an evidentiary hearing whenever a motion for fees is made, but requires an evidentiary hearing as a necessary precondition to awarding fees
Summary of this case from Independent Taxicab Assn. of Columbus v. Abate1995.
concluding that R.C. 2323.51[B], by its express terms, does not mandate an evidentiary hearing whenever a motion for fees is made, but requires an evidentiary hearing as a necessary precondition to awarding fees
Summary of this case from Independent Taxicab Assn. of Columbus v. AbateFull title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
'" Id., quoting Tosi, at 401. See, also, Justice v. Lutheran Social Serv. of Cent. Ohio (1992), 79 Ohio…
Cooper v. CooperWhile a constructive trust may arise when the property is acquired through fraud, duress, undue influence or…