From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Recology, Inc. v. Berkley Reg'l Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 12, 2023
20-cv-01150-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-01150-PJH

04-12-2023

RECOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

RE: DKT. NO. 120

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge

Before the court is the parties' joint motion to vacate the court's earlier order regarding cross motions for summary judgment (Dkt. 108). The parties request that the court vacate the order based solely on their agreement to make this joint request as part of their settlement. Dkt. 120 at 2. They submit a proposed order which states that the court has found “good cause” to vacate its order but provide no reason for their request or reason why the court should vacate its order or the authority, if any, for the request. If the parties wish the court to take such action, they must, at a minimum, provide the court with a compelling reason to do so. One or both parties must file a written response within one week of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Recology, Inc. v. Berkley Reg'l Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 12, 2023
20-cv-01150-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Recology, Inc. v. Berkley Reg'l Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RECOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 12, 2023

Citations

20-cv-01150-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2023)