From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rease v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 25, 2019
262 So. 3d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D18-3624

01-25-2019

Michael REASE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Michael Rease, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rease, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Rease v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 25, 2019
262 So. 3d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Rease v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael REASE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

262 So. 3d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)