From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rease v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 25, 2019
No. 1D18-3624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D18-3624

01-25-2019

MICHAEL REASE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Michael Rease, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. MAKAR, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Michael Rease, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Summaries of

Rease v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 25, 2019
No. 1D18-3624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Rease v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL REASE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 1D18-3624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2019)