In Reardon, the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the imposition of a lien on their property until a due process hearing could be held. Title 42 U.S.C. § 9607(1)(1) provides that "[a]ll costs and damages for which a person is liable to the United States under [CERCLA] shall constitute a lien in favor of the United States upon all real property...."
Summary of this case from Barmet Aluminum Corp. v. Reilly1990.
In Reardon, the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the imposition of a lien on their property until a due process hearing could be held. Title 42 U.S.C. § 9607(1)(1) provides that "[a]ll costs and damages for which a person is liable to the United States under [CERCLA] shall constitute a lien in favor of the United States upon all real property...."
Summary of this case from Barmet Aluminum Corp. v. ReillyIn Reardon, the EPA had taken cleanup actions at a polluted site, and then imposed a lien on the plaintiff's property to cover the agency's costs.
Summary of this case from Pactiv Corp. v. ChesterIn Reardon, the EPA had taken cleanup actions at a polluted site, and then imposed a lien on the plaintiff's property to cover the agency's costs.
Summary of this case from Pactiv Corporation v. ChesterFull title:REARDON v. UNITED STATES
Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Date published: Jan 1, 1990
927 F.2d at 295-96. First, it discussed Reardon v. United States, 922 F.2d 28 (1st Cir. 1990), in which the…
Pactiv Corp. v. Chester927 F.2d at 295-96. First, it discussed Reardon v. United States, 922 F.2d 28 (1st Cir. 1990), in which the…