From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rean v. Fnu Lnu

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 15, 2023
No. CIV-23-537-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-23-537-J

08-15-2023

RUSTY REX REAN, Petitioner, v. FNU LNU, Respondent.


ORDER

BERNARD M. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Doc. No. 3]. On July 14, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition under Rule 4 without prejudice to refiling. [Doc. No. 5]. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by August 4, 2023. Petitioner has filed no objection and has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] and DISMISSES Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition under Rule 4 without prejudice to refiling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rean v. Fnu Lnu

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 15, 2023
No. CIV-23-537-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Rean v. Fnu Lnu

Case Details

Full title:RUSTY REX REAN, Petitioner, v. FNU LNU, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 15, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-23-537-J (W.D. Okla. Aug. 15, 2023)