From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reading v. Beaudin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 1, 1959
271 F.2d 959 (2d Cir. 1959)

Summary

In Reading v. Beaudin, 271 F.2d 959 (2d Cir. 1959), the Court affirmed in a memorandum decision the District Court's order granting a petition for complete exoneration from liability.

Summary of this case from Complaint of Myers

Opinion

No. 46, Docket 25584.

Argued November 17, 1959.

Decided December 1, 1959.

Appeal from a final decree of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, in Admiralty; James T. Foley, Judge.

Claimant appeals from a decree granting a petition for complete exoneration from liability and dismissing appellant's claim. Opinion below reported at 169 F. Supp. 165.

John L. Quinlan, New York City (John B. Shields and Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, New York City, and Carter Conboy Albany, N.Y., on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

William W. Millington, Lake George, N.Y. (Millington Garlick, Lake George, N.Y., on the brief), for claimant-appellant.

Before MAGRUDER, MEDINA and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


The decree is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Foley, D.C., 169 F. Supp. 165.


Summaries of

Reading v. Beaudin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 1, 1959
271 F.2d 959 (2d Cir. 1959)

In Reading v. Beaudin, 271 F.2d 959 (2d Cir. 1959), the Court affirmed in a memorandum decision the District Court's order granting a petition for complete exoneration from liability.

Summary of this case from Complaint of Myers
Case details for

Reading v. Beaudin

Case Details

Full title:Matter of the Petition of Eugene P. READING, 30 Aberdeen Road, Elizabeth…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 1959

Citations

271 F.2d 959 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Young v. Clear Lake Yacht Basin, Inc.

This is so, even if the electrical gear was in perfect working order, given the attendant and foreseeable…

Complaint of Myers

Related cases from within this Circuit are not more determinative. In Reading v. Beaudin, 271 F.2d 959 (2d…