From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Razak v. Leissner

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 2, 2021
1:20-mc-00387(JGK)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-mc-00387(JGK)(KHP)

07-02-2021

MOHD NAJIB BIN ABD RAZAK, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY LEISSNER AND THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC, Respondents.

DAVID LOCKE HALL Attorney Wiggin & Dana, LLP Counsel for Petitioner


DAVID LOCKE HALL Attorney Wiggin & Dana, LLP Counsel for Petitioner

Hon. Katharine H. Parker Magistrate Judge

NOTICE OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Hon. John G. Koeltl United States District Judge

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that going forward Petitioner Mohd Najib Bin Abd Razak will no longer be represented in this matter by David Locke Hall.

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 1.4, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court order the withdrawal of counsel, David Locke Hall and no longer send him docketing notifications via the ECF system. As counsel Kevin Carroll, Paul Aaron Tuchmann and John Matthew Doroghazi will continue to represent Petitioner, Mr. Hall's participation is no longer necessary.

Withdrawing counsel is neither retaining nor charging a lien.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Razak v. Leissner

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 2, 2021
1:20-mc-00387(JGK)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Razak v. Leissner

Case Details

Full title:MOHD NAJIB BIN ABD RAZAK, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY LEISSNER AND THE GOLDMAN…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

1:20-mc-00387(JGK)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2021)