From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 29, 2024
CV 24-02400-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-02400-SPG-BFM

05-29-2024

Fernando Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Services, LLC et al

Patricia Gomez


Patricia Gomez

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before June 12, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant's Cambridge Healthcare Services, LLC, and KF Sunray LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 29, 2024
CV 24-02400-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Fernando Raymundo v. Cambridge Healthcare Services, LLC et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

CV 24-02400-SPG-BFM (C.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)