From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raymond v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-92-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-92-DBH

01-18-2013

DANL W. RAYMOND, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 31, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on January 17, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

S O O RDERED.

_________________

D. BROCK HORNBY

U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE


Summaries of

Raymond v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-92-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Raymond v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DANL W. RAYMOND, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-92-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Simard v. Colvin

" That is not enough to meet this rather rigorous standard. The rule itself says that the administrative law…