From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 7, 2000
30 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77646

FILED: November 7, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE MAURA B. MCSHANE.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for Appellant.

John M. Morris III, Supreme Court Building, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



Tina Ray (hereinafter, "Movant") appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing in that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform her that upon completion of a long term drug treatment program Movant would be eligible for probation and not parole.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion's court decision was not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 7, 2000
30 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ray v. State

Case Details

Full title:TINA RAY, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 7, 2000

Citations

30 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)