Opinion
(Filed 12 November, 1924.)
APPEAL by plaintiff from Sinclair, J., at March Term, 1924, of DURHAM.
Brogden, Reade Bryant for plaintiff.
R. H. Sykes for defendant.
This was an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in the court below. From the evidence set out in the record, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiff, we think the case should have been submitted to a jury. The evidence excluded was competent.
We think the case is governed by the principle laid down in Taylor v. Lee, 187 N.C. p. 393.
For the reasons given, the judgment must be
Reversed.