From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. AT&T Mobility Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 22, 2022
Civil Action 18-3303 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2022)

Summary

noting that the plaintiff “fail[ed] to present any evidence showing that any client has willingly agreed to pay” the hourly rates sought

Summary of this case from Pa. State Lodge Fraternal of Police Pa. v. Twp. of Springfield

Opinion

Civil Action 18-3303

04-22-2022

ALISON RAY, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

AND NOW, on April 22, 2022, based on my consideration of Plaintiff Alison Ray's Petition for Attorney Fees and Costs (doc. 172) and Defendants AT&T Mobility Services, LLC's Response (doc. 178), and for the reasons stated in my accompanying opinion, it is ORDERED that Ms. Ray's Petition is granted in part and denied in part, and she shall be awarded $764, 825.00 in attorney fees and $38, 643.86 in costs.


Summaries of

Ray v. AT&T Mobility Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 22, 2022
Civil Action 18-3303 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2022)

noting that the plaintiff “fail[ed] to present any evidence showing that any client has willingly agreed to pay” the hourly rates sought

Summary of this case from Pa. State Lodge Fraternal of Police Pa. v. Twp. of Springfield
Case details for

Ray v. AT&T Mobility Servs.

Case Details

Full title:ALISON RAY, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 18-3303 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Meigs v. Care Providers Ins. Servs.

In her Petition, Plaintiff refers to the following cases where CML's rates were discussed: (1) Hightower v.…

Pa. State Lodge Fraternal of Police Pa. v. Twp. of Springfield

The Court notes that Plaintiffs have submitted no evidence that they, or any other client, agreed to pay an…