Opinion
CIVIL File 22-2666 (MJD/DJF)
01-12-2024
RAY H., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,[1]Defendant.
Clifford Michael Farrell, Manring & Farrell, Edward C. Olson, Reitan Law Office, Counsel for Plaintiff. Ana H. Voss, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant.
Clifford Michael Farrell, Manring & Farrell, Edward C. Olson, Reitan Law Office, Counsel for Plaintiff.
Ana H. Voss, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant.
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster dated November 6, 2023. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Foster. The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster dated November 6, 2023. [Doc. 20.]
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 14] is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 17] is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.