From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rauf v. Shanahan

United States District Court Southern District of New York
May 18, 2012
11 Civ. 7755 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ. 7755 (JGK)

05-18-2012

ABDUL RAUF, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, ET AL., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

On April 27, 2012, the Government requested that the petitioner's petition be dismissed as moot because he is no longer in custody. The Government represented that in April the petitioner's case had been reviewed by ICE, and that ICE had subsequently determined that the petitioner should be released. See Letter dated April 27, 2012, Rauf v. Shanahan, No. 11 Civ. 7775, Docket No. 17 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2012). The Government represented that the petitioner had in fact been released from detention. Id. The Government's letter was copied to the petitioner at an address in Brooklyn. Id.

The Court requested that the petitioner respond to the Government's request by May 11, 2012, and the petitioner has not responded. Id.

When a habeas petitioner challenges only the lawfulness of his or her detention, and the petitioner is subsequently released from detention, the petition is rendered moot and should be dismissed. See Baptiste v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, No. 06 Civ. 0615, 2006 WL 3050884, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2006) (collecting cases); see also Edwards v. Ashcroft, 126 F. App'x 4, 4-5 (2d Cir. 2005) (summary order). The petitioner's petition in this case seeks only a declaration that he is eligible to be released from detention, and an order directing that he be released from detention. See Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Rauf v. Shanahan, No, 11 Civ. 7775, Docket No. 1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2011), at 13. The petitioner has not alleged that he "suffers from any 'collateral consequences' of detention," and the petition does not indicate that any such collateral consequences exist or are being challenged. Baptiste, 2006 WL 3050884, at *2. It therefore appears that the petition is now moot.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice as moot.

The Clerk is directed to close this case and any pending motions. The Clerk is also directed to send a copy of this Order to the petitioner at the following address: 861 48th Street, Apt. 1B, Brooklyn, New York 11220.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: Hew York, New York

May 18, 2012

___________

John G. Koeltl

States District Judge


Summaries of

Rauf v. Shanahan

United States District Court Southern District of New York
May 18, 2012
11 Civ. 7755 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Rauf v. Shanahan

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL RAUF, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, ET AL., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court Southern District of New York

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

11 Civ. 7755 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2012)