From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rathy v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 19, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-72 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-72

08-19-2014

GEORGE F. RATHY, SR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary for Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On July 28, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 66) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the DOC Defendants (Doc. 64) be granted and that the Motions to Dismiss, which were converted into Motions for Summary Judgment, filed by Dr. Y. Alex Suvorov (Doc. 57) and Dr. Scott Morgan (Doc. 59) also be granted. The Report further recommended that Defendants Grave and Al Harvey be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim against them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), that leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint be denied, and that the case be closed. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

The Motion to Dismiss filed by the DOC Defendants (Doc. 64) and the Motions to Dismiss, which were converted into Motions for Summary Judgment, filed by Dr. Y. Alex Suvorov (Doc. 57) and Dr. Scott Morgan (Doc. 59) are GRANTED. Defendants Grave and Al Harvey are DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim against them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint is DENIED, and this case will be CLOSED. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated July 28, 2014, is hereby adopted as the opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. August 19, 2014

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): George F. Rathy, Sr.
General Delivery
141 Summer Drive
Karns City, PA 16041


Summaries of

Rathy v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 19, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-72 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Rathy v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE F. RATHY, SR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary for…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-72 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2014)

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Wrenn

The cases cited by defendants to support their argument regarding whether paruresis substantially limits the…

Lucas v. Gregg Appliances, Inc.

Several courts prior to the 2008 ADA amendments held that paruresis is not a disability. See, e.g., Rathy v.…