From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rasmussen v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 28, 1923
215 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. A-4188.

Opinion Filed June 28, 1923.

Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; W.R. Taylor, Judge.

Lena Rasmussen was convicted of maintaining a liquor nuisance, and she appeals. Affirmed.

The Attorney General, for the State.


Plaintiff in error, Lena Rasmussen, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on the 17th day of October, 1921, of the offense of maintaining a liquor nuisance, and sentenced to pay a fine of $300 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 90 days. The information alleges the offense to have been committed on or about the 9th day of August, 1921, on the premises located at 203, West Noble street in the city of Oklahoma City, Okla. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on the 23d day of January, 1922, and the cause was submitted on the 8th day of March, 1923. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

"Where no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment."

After an examination of the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment and the same is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Rasmussen v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 28, 1923
215 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

Rasmussen v. State

Case Details

Full title:LENA RASMUSSEN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 28, 1923

Citations

215 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1923)
215 P. 1118

Citing Cases

State v. Porter

At no time was defendant, who represented himself at trial, informed by the court of his right to have the…

Draper v. Rhay

The corporate status of the businesses or the individual status is not something that will be passed on here,…