Raske v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Full title: WILLIAM JEFFREY RASKE, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 23, 2015

No. 67093 (Nev. Jul. 23, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67093

07-23-2015

WILLIAM JEFFREY RASKE, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.

Saitta

An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This pro se writ petition challenges a district court default judgment and a post-judgment ruling on a claim of exemption. In light of the underlying matter's progression since this writ petition was filed, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is unwarranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that this court's intervention is warranted). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: William Jeffrey Raske

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk