From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rashinski v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 22, 1941
312 Ill. App. 260 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,726. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 22, 1941

INSURANCE, § 308estoppel to forfeit. Where the jury could find in an action to recover on an insurance policy that the insurance company induced the insured to believe that payment of the premium could be made after the due date, a forefeiture is barred where the payment is made before the last day of the extended period.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from County Court of Cook county; Hon. PAUL H. REIS, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at June term, 1941.

Meyer A. Ginsburg, for appellant;

Earl J. Walker, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed December 22, 1941.


Summaries of

Rashinski v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 22, 1941
312 Ill. App. 260 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Rashinski v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:Josephine Rashinski, Appellee, v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 22, 1941

Citations

312 Ill. App. 260 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
38 N.E.2d 362

Citing Cases

Western States Mut. Ins. v. Standard Mut. Ins. Co.

Condition 17 is neither excuse to refuse to pay a collision loss nor any justification for a subrogation…

Remsen v. Midway Liquors, Inc.

'" [12] A policy of insurance is construed most favorable to the named insured and others who are covered by…