From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rashid v. Manning

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 27, 1997
773 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 97-843

Opinion filed March 27, 1997.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction-Habeas Corpus.

LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 87-26640

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and John E. Morrison, Special Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Keith S. Kromash, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.


Because, as the respondent jailer apparently concedes, the record not only does not support, but is directly contrary to the trial court's pro forma finding that the petitioner, who is incarcerated pursuant to an order of civil contempt for his failure to pay child support, has the present ability to pay the purge amount, the petition for Habeas Corpus is granted with directions that he forthwith be discharged from custody. Betancourt v. Manning, 679 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Roundtree v. Felton, 656 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Johnson v. Felton, 655 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Blanco v. Roth, 655 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). See generally Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Petition granted.

This action is of course without prejudice to any appropriate action to secure Rashid's compliance with his support obligations.


Summaries of

Rashid v. Manning

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 27, 1997
773 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Rashid v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:JERRY RASHID, Petitioner, vs. DONALD MANNING, Director, Dade County…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 27, 1997

Citations

773 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)