From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 16, 2004
150 S.W.3d 127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 83919.

November 16, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Emmett M. O'Brien, Judge.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., MARY K. HOFF, J.


ORDER


Dedric L. Rash (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Previously we affirmed Movant's convictions of attempted kidnapping, sections 564.011 and 565.110 RSMo 2000 and robbery in the second degree, section 569.030. State v. Rash, 89 S.W.3d 526 (Mo.App.E.D. 2002). Movant now contends his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the admission of telephone records without a proper foundation to establish their authenticity.

All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 16, 2004
150 S.W.3d 127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Rash v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dedric L. RASH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 16, 2004

Citations

150 S.W.3d 127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)