From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rao v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.).


Petitioner's showing of respondent's receipt of actual knowledge of the underlying facts by reason of the involvement of its employee in the accident and its filing of a police accident report, and the absence of prejudice by reason of this virtually immediate knowledge, warrants the granting of leave ( see, Matter of Soto v New York City Hous. Auth., 180 A.D.2d 570). Unlike the accident report in Matter of Green v New York City Hous. Auth. ( 180 A.D.2d 586), which was prepared by the claimant and did not contain details sufficient to furnish notice of any claim of negligence, here the report, which is congruent with petitioner's claims as to time and place and vehicles involved, clearly shows that respondent was aware of the underlying facts sufficiently to investigate.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Rao v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1996
223 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Rao v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Case Details

Full title:GADAM RAO, Respondent, v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 3

Citing Cases

Talavera v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth. Co.

It is also clear that the report reflects that the Petitioner fell on to the tracks, and was not pushed.…

Negron v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transp. Operating Auth.

Moreover, a description of the accident is provided with sufficient details to establish potential liability…