From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RAO v. "JOHN" McAULIFFE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 8, 1925
124 Misc. 331 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)

Opinion

January 8, 1925.

O.H. Droege, for the appellants.

Samuel Berger, for the respondent.


There is no requirement in law that parties seeking increased rental must be the owners of the fee involved for any fixed period of time.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with ten dollars costs to the appellants to abide the final award of costs.

All concur; present, GUY, O'MALLEY and LEVY, JJ.


Summaries of

RAO v. "JOHN" McAULIFFE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 8, 1925
124 Misc. 331 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
Case details for

RAO v. "JOHN" McAULIFFE

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH W. RAO and Others, Appellants, v . "JOHN" McAULIFFE, the First Name…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 8, 1925

Citations

124 Misc. 331 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
208 N.Y.S. 42