From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ransom Randolph Company v. Local 12, Int'l Union

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 6, 2007
Case No. 3:06CV2710 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06CV2710.

March 6, 2007


ORDER


This case arises from an arbitration conducted under a collective bargaining agreement. The employer seeks to vacate the award.

Pending is a motion by individual members of the defendant union for leave to intervene. The gravamen of their request is that they are real parties in interest, in view of the financial benefit that they will obtain if the arbitration award is upheld.

Plaintiff company opposes the motion. It contends that individuals are without standing to participate in arbitration proceedings under the collective bargaining agreement. In response, the union points to the financial stake of the individuals, and their circumstance as "affected parties."

Plaintiff does not contend that any delay or prejudice will result if the intervention is allowed. Given the financial stake of the proposed additional parties, I agree that it is appropriate to allow permissive intervention under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b).

It is, therefore,

ORDERED THAT motion for intervention be, and the same hereby is granted.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Ransom Randolph Company v. Local 12, Int'l Union

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 6, 2007
Case No. 3:06CV2710 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Ransom Randolph Company v. Local 12, Int'l Union

Case Details

Full title:Ransom Randolph Company, Plaintiff v. Local 12, Int'l Union, U.A.W., etc.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 6, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06CV2710 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 2007)