From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankin-El v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Civil No. 06-273 DSD/AJB (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

Summary

In Rankin-El, the petitioner, Mr. Rankin-El, brought a § 2241 petition after he was denied the opportunity to have his sentence reduced upon completing the RDAP program.

Summary of this case from Donald v. Hudgins

Opinion

Civil No. 06-273 DSD/AJB.

February 13, 2007


ORDER


Based uponthe Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated January 25, 2007, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, (Docket No. 1), is DENIED; and

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Rankin-El v. Holinka

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Civil No. 06-273 DSD/AJB (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

In Rankin-El, the petitioner, Mr. Rankin-El, brought a § 2241 petition after he was denied the opportunity to have his sentence reduced upon completing the RDAP program.

Summary of this case from Donald v. Hudgins
Case details for

Rankin-El v. Holinka

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HENRY RANKIN-EL, Petitioner, v. CAROL HOLINKA, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-273 DSD/AJB (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Sok v. Eischen

” Courts have consistently held that sentence calculation by the BOP and the BOP's administration of…

Wold v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Id.Similar facts and a similar conclusion were presented in Rankin-El v. Holinka, 2007 WL 495004 (D. Minn.…