From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 21, 2012
101 So. 3d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–2920.

2012-11-21

Daniel RANGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CF005649AXXXX. Daniel Rangel, Arcadia, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CF005649AXXXX.
Daniel Rangel, Arcadia, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court's June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 21, 2012
101 So. 3d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Rangel v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daniel RANGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

101 So. 3d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)