Rangel v. State

Full title: GUADELUPE RANGEL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 18, 1994

644 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-1529.

November 18, 1994.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Judge.

Appellant pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.