From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 18, 2011
No. CV-10-8234-PCT-FJM (D. Ariz. Jan. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-10-8234-PCT-FJM.

January 18, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiffs Louis S. Rangel and Laurie C. Rangel bring this action against BAC Home Loans Servicing and Darla Sproles asserting allegations of wrongful foreclosure and deceptive business practices. Plaintiffs originally filed this action in the Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County on October 15, 2010 in order to prevent the foreclosure of property located at 2450 Mountain View, Cottonwood Arizona (doc. 1, ex. 1). Defendants removed the action to this court on November 24, 2010 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. The court has before it a motion to dismiss by defendants (doc. 8), and motion for summary disposition (doc. 9). Plaintiffs have failed to respond.

On or about November 26, 2005, Joyce Hamlin borrowed $240,000.00 from American Wholesale Lender, as evidenced by a promissory note and deed of trust. Ms. Hamlin later defaulted on her loan and plaintiffs do not allege the debt has been satisfied or brought current. Plaintiff Laurie C. Rangel brings this action in her own name, asserting that she is the sole owner of the property. Complaint at 5. Defendants seek dismissal, arguing that plaintiffs lack standing, did not effectuate proper service, and fail to state a cause of action.

Although plaintiffs did not attach the Note, Deed of Trust, and Trustee Sale Information to the complaint, plaintiffs referenced them. Since they are matters of public record they are properly subject to judicial notice. See Pesci v. IRS, 67 F. Supp. 2d 1189, 1191-92 (D. Nev. 1999), aff'd, 225 F.3d 663 (9th Cir. 2000).

Plaintiffs response was due December 30, 2010. It is now January 18, 2011 and no response has been filed. LRCiv 7.2(i) permits summary disposition of motions for non-compliance with briefing requirements. Failure to respond is deemed consent to the granting of the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice (doc. 8). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING defendants' motion for summary disposition as moot (doc. 9).

DATED this 18th day of January, 2011.


Summaries of

Rangel v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 18, 2011
No. CV-10-8234-PCT-FJM (D. Ariz. Jan. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Rangel v. Bac Home Loans Servicing LP

Case Details

Full title:Louis S. Rangel; Laurie C. Rangel, Plaintiffs, v. BAC Home Loans Servicing…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jan 18, 2011

Citations

No. CV-10-8234-PCT-FJM (D. Ariz. Jan. 18, 2011)