From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. U.S. Attorney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2015
598 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-1094

03-20-2015

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY, Technology (Illegal home business), Defendant - Appellee.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00009-CCB) Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Randolph's motions to amend and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. U.S. Attorney, No. 1:15-cv-00009-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Randolph v. U.S. Attorney

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2015
598 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Randolph v. U.S. Attorney

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

598 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2015)