From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 1978
360 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-1836.

July 26, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bartow, and Wayne Chalu, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant appeals his sentence imposed under Florida Statute 775.084. The record before this court shows that the appellant was convicted of a felony within five years prior to the committing of the felony for which he was convicted and sentenced in this case.

Appellant contends that the prior felony conviction was reversed by this court and, therefore, he received an illegal sentence under Florida Statute 775.084. The record before us is completely devoid of any disposition of the prior felony on appeal. Therefore, appellant is attempting to collaterally attack the sentence which from this record is valid.

Randolph v. State, 336 So.2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

The appropriate method to collaterally attack a sentence which appears from the record to be valid is by motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

GRIMES, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Randolph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 1978
360 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Randolph v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY RANDOLPH, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 26, 1978

Citations

360 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Monroe v. State

We believe appellant should raise this issue in the trial court by a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal…