From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
23-cv-05456-JSC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05456-JSC

04-22-2024

RAMELLO RANDLE, Plaintiff, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States District Judge.

On February 6, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an amended complaint, and warned that if he did not do so the case would be dismissed. He has not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown cause why not. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary).

Plaintiff has filed several other new cases that will be addressed in separate orders.

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
23-cv-05456-JSC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:RAMELLO RANDLE, Plaintiff, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05456-JSC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)