From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randazza v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

01-09-2013

MARC J. RANDAZZA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CRYSTAL COX, et al., Defendants.


ORDER


(Mtn to Strike - Dkt. #16)

This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Marc J. Randazza's, Jennifer Randazza, and Natalia Randazza's Motion to Strike (Dkt. #16) filed December 21, 2012. The court has considered the Motion.

The Motion represents that Defendant Cox e-mailed Plaintiffs, "and presumably" mailed to the court, an exhibit that contains Plaintiff Marc Randazza's home phone number. Motion at 1:22-23. Plaintiffs request that "the exhibits mailed by Defendant be stricken and not placed on the public record." Id. at 1:18-20. Plaintiffs do not indicate which of Defendant Cox's multiple filings contains the exhibit.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Dkt. #16) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

________________________

PEGGY A. LEEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Randazza v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Randazza v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:MARC J. RANDAZZA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CRYSTAL COX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2013)