From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0012 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-0012 KJN P

02-27-2015

VIRGIL DOUGLAS RANDALL, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondents.


ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed January 14, 2015, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk assign a district judge to this case.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: February 27, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/rand0012fpf


Summaries of

Randall v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0012 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Randall v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIL DOUGLAS RANDALL, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0012 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2015)