From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2020
CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:18-cv-879-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:18-cv-879-ECM (WO)

01-13-2020

KRIZIA L. RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE US, INC. Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

On December 16, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 13) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

A separate Final Judgment will be entered.

Done this 13th day of January, 2020.

/s/ Emily C. Marks

EMILY C. MARKS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Randall v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2020
CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:18-cv-879-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Randall v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KRIZIA L. RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE US, INC. Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:18-cv-879-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

McCoy v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.

Courts in this Circuit have dismissed complaints under Rule 12(b)(6) when plaintiffs fail to put forward…