From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. Davis Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. CIV 2:12-cv-2689 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. CIV 2:12-cv-2689 KJM AC PS

01-07-2013

THOMAS RANDALL, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 26, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6) and 12(f). No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed.

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." In addition, Local Rule 230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 16, 2013 is vacated. Hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to February 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiffs shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than February 6, 2013. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

_______________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Randall v. Davis Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. CIV 2:12-cv-2689 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Randall v. Davis Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RANDALL, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. CIV 2:12-cv-2689 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)