From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ranasinghe v. Delrosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05440

Submitted May 7, 2003.

May 27, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated May 10, 2002, as granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Irene Ranasinghe did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Satish K. Bhatia, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Kelly, Rode Kelly, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Anthony U. DeVito of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the affirmed reports prepared by Dr. Toledano and Dr. Essuman, which the defendants submitted in support of their motion, were admissible (see CPLR 2106; cf. Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 270). Although these affirmed reports inadequately addressed the results of the magnetic resonance imaging examinations that evidenced disc bulges, which may constitute a serious injury (see Chaplin v. Taylor, 273 A.D.2d 188), the defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants negated the sole ground of serious injury asserted in the plaintiffs' bill of particulars, that the injuries prevented the injured plaintiff from performing substantially all of the material acts constituting her customary daily activities for at least 90 days out of the 180 days following the accident (see Insurance Law 5102[d]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to rebut this initial showing (see Letellier v. Walker, 222 A.D.2d 658, 659). Thus, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants (see Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ranasinghe v. Delrosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ranasinghe v. Delrosso

Case Details

Full title:IRENE RANASINGHE, ET AL., appellants, v. MICHAEL DELROSSO, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

Stokes v. Brown

Similarly, we conclude that defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that plaintiff Bobbi A.…