From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 13, 2011
373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 56569.

01-13-2011

Roderick D. RAMSEY, Appellant, v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Roderick D. Ramsey Attorney General/Las Vegas


Roderick D. Ramsey

Attorney General/Las Vegas

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for a writ of mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Donald M. Mosley, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his petition, filed on May 24, 2010, appellant challenged administrative regulations promulgated pursuant to NRS 209.481 and the impact of those regulations on his placement within the Nevada prison system. Appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. See NRS 34.160 ; Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603–04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) ; Poulos v. District Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982). Because appellant's claims challenged the conditions of his confinement, he should have raised them in a civil rights action. Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 686 P.2d 250 (1984). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jan 13, 2011
373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Ramsey v. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Roderick D. RAMSEY, Appellant, v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 953 (Nev. 2011)