From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 15, 1908
93 P. 754 (Okla. 1908)

Opinion

No. 7

Opinion Filed January 15, 1908.

Application by Remus B. Ramsey for writ of mandamus to John H. King, judge of the district court of Muskogee county. Writ granted.

J. E. Wyand, Thomas H. Owen and Baker Pursel, for relator.

George S. Ramsey, for respondent.


This proceeding was submitted to the court upon the same response and agreed statement of facts as the case of Toney Matney v. John H. King, Judge of the District Court of Muskogee County, State of Oklahoma, reported in this volume, 93 P. 737; the only difference in the cases being that the relator in the Matney Case sought, by mandamus, to be recognized as clerk of the district court, and in this case the relator seeks recognition as sheriff of Muskogee county. Both relators being officers of the court, the same rule will apply in both cases. On the authority of the Matney Case, let a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding the respondent as judge of the district court of Muskogee county, state of Oklahoma, to recognize the relator as sheriff of said county and state, and to permit said relator to do and perform all the duties which, under the law, he is required to do and perform as sheriff of said county and state.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 15, 1908
93 P. 754 (Okla. 1908)
Case details for

Ramsey v. King

Case Details

Full title:RAMSEY v. KING, Judge

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 15, 1908

Citations

93 P. 754 (Okla. 1908)
93 P. 754

Citing Cases

Petuskey v. Cannon

(E.A.) A court clerk is, therefore, clearly bound by common law. Oklahoma common law has consistently…

Matney v. King

"W. H. L. CAMPBELL, Clerk Supreme Court. "It is agreed that the result of this case shall control and be…