From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 10, 2017
NO. 02-17-00179-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 02-17-00179-CR

08-10-2017

EMILIO SAUCEDA RAMOS APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 1469249D MEMORANDUM OPINION

Emilio Sauceda Ramos attempts to appeal from a plea in bar, that is, his admission of an unadjudicated offense under penal code section 12.45. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.45 (West 2011). Generally, with exceptions inapplicable here, this court has jurisdiction to consider appeals by criminal defendants only after a final judgment of conviction. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). An order granting a plea in bar is not a judgment of conviction. See Hilburn v. State, 946 S.W.2d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.); see also Bradley v. State, Nos. 02-14-00218-CR, 02-14-00219-CR, 02-14-00220-CR, 2014 WL 3029220, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 3, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

Section 12.45 provides that during a sentencing hearing and with the State's consent, a defendant may admit his guilt of an unadjudicated offense and request that the court take the offense into account in determining the sentence for the offense of which he has been adjudged guilty. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.45(a). If the trial court lawfully takes into account an admitted offense under section 12.45, prosecution for that offense is barred. Id. § 12.45(c).

On June 14, 2017, we notified Ramos of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and stated that the appeal could be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before June 26, 2017, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). We have not received a response.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id.; Hilburn, 946 S.W.2d at 886 (holding that appellate court lacks jurisdiction over appeal from judgment granting a plea in bar under section 12.45).

Ramos's appeals in cause numbers 02-17-00163-CR and 02-17-00164-CR remain pending in this court.

PER CURIAM PANEL: KERR, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and PITTMAN, J. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 10, 2017


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 10, 2017
NO. 02-17-00179-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:EMILIO SAUCEDA RAMOS APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 10, 2017

Citations

NO. 02-17-00179-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)

Citing Cases

Graham-O'dell v. State

Thus, we dismiss Graham's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 43.2(f); Courtney, 2022 WL…