From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Fischer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 24, 2012
11 Civ, 8664 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ, 8664 (ALC) (AJP)

10-24-2012

Albert Ramos, Plaintiff, v. Brian Fischer, J. Benedict & Joe Ford, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge:

Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of United States Magistrate Judge Andre J. Peck recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint (filed on February 28, 2012) be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve it pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) (Dkt. 12.) When no objection is made to a portion of a report and recommendation, the Court subjects that portion of the report and recommendation to only a clear error review. See Lewis v. Zon. 573 F.Supp.2d 804, 811 (S.D.N.Y.2008); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note (b). Despite having been notified of his right to file an Objection, none has been filed. I have reviewed the R & R for clear error, and fine none. Accordingly, I adopt the R & R for the reasons stated therein. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

October 24, 2012

_________________

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ramos v. Fischer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 24, 2012
11 Civ, 8664 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Ramos v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:Albert Ramos, Plaintiff, v. Brian Fischer, J. Benedict & Joe Ford…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 24, 2012

Citations

11 Civ, 8664 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2012)