From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. 5544 LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division
Jan 4, 2023
No. SA-22-CV-01342-XR (W.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

SA-22-CV-01342-XR

01-04-2023

ROBERT RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. 5544 LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court in the above-styled cause of action is Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [#1], which was filed on December 15, 2022, and referred to the undersigned for disposition. The undersigned therefore has authority to enter this order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). By his motion, Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) based on an inability to afford court fees and costs. Having considered the motion and documentation provided by Plaintiff, the Court will grant the motion to proceed IFP and order service of Plaintiff's Complaint.

All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350, as well as an administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP includes his income and asset information, which indicates that Plaintiff is unemployed but receives $814 per month in disability benefits and relies on public assistance to meet his basic needs. Plaintiff's motion also lists his monthly expenses, demonstrating that his expenses exceed his income. Plaintiff does not have sufficient monthly resources available to pay the filing fee, and the Court will grant the motion to proceed IFP.

The administrative fee, which is currently $50, is waived for plaintiffs who are granted IFP status. See District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, available at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/fees/district-court-miscellaneous-fee-schedule.

Pursuant to the Court's October 8, 2019 Standing Order, the undersigned has reviewed Plaintiff's proposed Complaint for frivolousness pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Court finds that Plaintiff's proposed Complaint [#1-2] asserts at least one non-frivolous claim. Therefore, Defendant should be served with this lawsuit.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [#1] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [#1-2] shall be filed by the Clerk without prepayment of fees, costs or the giving of security therefore, and the Clerk shall, until further Order of this Court, waive the collection of any other fees or costs from Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue the summons attached to Plaintiff's motion [#1-5].


Summaries of

Ramos v. 5544 LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division
Jan 4, 2023
No. SA-22-CV-01342-XR (W.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Ramos v. 5544 LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. 5544 LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

No. SA-22-CV-01342-XR (W.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)