Opinion
Case Nos. 2D18-367 2D18-369 CONSOLIDATED
11-06-2019
Wilfredo RAMOS-HADDOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Wilfredo Ramos-Haddock challenges an order revoking his probation in case numbers 2012-CF-3806 and 2012-CF-10891 after he admitted violating his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation and the sentences without comment.
The State correctly concedes, however, that the trial court erred in entering a written order of revocation of probation that did not specify the condition(s) that Ramos-Haddock violated. See Underwood v. State, 98 So. 3d 745, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (and cases cited therein). In addition, the amended judgment and sentence in case number 2012-CF-3806 erroneously indicate that he admitted that he had violated condition 5 of his probation. Accordingly, we reverse the order revoking probation in both cases and remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that specifies the condition(s) violated. On remand, the trial court shall also strike the statement in the amended judgment and sentence in case number 2012-CF-3806 that Ramos-Haddock admitted that he had violated condition 5 of his probation.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.