From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 2003
307 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-02653

Argued January 30, 2003.

July 7, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant, Colonial Steel Corp., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D. Schmidt, J.), dated December 13, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Vincent P. Crisci, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael B. Palillo (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac De Cicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant, Colonial Steel Corp., the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant failed to tender sufficient evidence demonstrating the absence of any material issues of fact ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853).

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 2003
307 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SAVITRI RAMLALL, ET AL., respondents, v. COLONIAL STEEL CORP., appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Vestal v. County of Suffolk

What degree of care is reasonable necessarily depends upon the attendant circumstances and is a jury…